Amazfit GTS 4 vs COROS Pace 3
At $199.99 and $229, the Amazfit GTS 4 and COROS Pace 3 sit close enough in price to be genuine alternatives — here's how they actually compare.
The Amazfit GTS 4 brings a 1.75" display, 7 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS to the table.
Global reference price
The COROS Pace 3 offers a 1.2" display, 24 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS, 5ATM water resistance.
Global reference price
Specification Comparison
Key Differences
The COROS Pace 3 lasts noticeably longer between charges — 24 days versus 7 — which matters most for multi-day trips or anyone who dislikes daily charging routines. Screen size also favors the Amazfit GTS 4, at 1.75" versus the COROS Pace 3's 1.2", making it easier to read notifications and metrics at a glance.
Pros & Cons
Amazfit GTS 4
Pros
- Larger 1.75" display
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Shorter battery life (7 days)
COROS Pace 3
Pros
- Much longer battery life (24 days)
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Smaller 1.2" display
- Costs a bit more
Which One Is Right For You?
- Amazfit GTS 4: A good fit for buyers who prefers a larger, easier-to-read display and wants to spend a little less.
- COROS Pace 3: Makes the most sense for anyone who wants to charge as infrequently as possible.
Conclusion
Neither watch is a strict downgrade from the other — each wins on a different practical dimension, so the right pick depends on which of those matters more day to day.
Summary
Amazfit GTS 4
Strengths
- Larger 1.75" display
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Shorter battery life (7 days)
COROS Pace 3
Strengths
- Much longer battery life (24 days)
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Smaller 1.2" display
- Costs a bit more
There's no universal winner here — match the pick to whichever tradeoff (battery life, screen, or connectivity) actually applies to daily use.