Amazfit GTS 4 vs Fossil Gen 6
Shoppers weighing the Amazfit GTS 4 against the Fossil Gen 6 are looking at two smartwatches within $99.01 of each other, which puts the real decision on which one's feature set actually fits how it'll be worn day to day.
The Amazfit GTS 4 is built around a 1.75" display, 7 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS.
Global reference price
The Fossil Gen 6 packs a 1.28" display, 1 day of typical battery life, built-in GPS.
Global reference price
Specification Comparison
Key Differences
Battery life is a major gap here: the Amazfit GTS 4 is rated for 7 days against the Fossil Gen 6's 1, meaning far fewer trips to the charger. The Amazfit GTS 4 has a visibly larger display (1.75" vs 1.28"), an advantage for reading data on the move.
Pros & Cons
Amazfit GTS 4
Pros
- Much longer battery life (7 days)
- Larger 1.75" display
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Fossil Gen 6
Pros
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
- Smaller 1.28" display
- Costs a bit more
Which One Is Right For You?
- Amazfit GTS 4: Best for someone who wants to charge as infrequently as possible, prefers a larger, easier-to-read display and wants to spend a little less.
- Fossil Gen 6: A good fit for buyers who prefers Fossil's ecosystem and design.
Conclusion
The two trade advantages on different fronts rather than one clearly beating the other outright, so the better fit depends on what matters most for daily wear.
Summary
Amazfit GTS 4
Strengths
- Much longer battery life (7 days)
- Larger 1.75" display
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Fossil Gen 6
Strengths
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
- Smaller 1.28" display
- Costs a bit more
Weigh the tradeoffs above against actual use: battery life, screen size, and connectivity matter differently depending on how the watch will be worn day to day.