Amazfit GTS 4 vs Timex Metropolitan R
The Amazfit GTS 4 and the Timex Metropolitan R are priced $20.99 apart — $199.99 versus $179 — close enough that the choice between them comes down to features, not budget.
The Amazfit GTS 4 offers a 1.75" display, 7 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS.
Global reference price
The Timex Metropolitan R brings a 1.2" display, 12 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS to the table.
Global reference price
Specification Comparison
Key Differences
With 12 days of battery life against 7, the Timex Metropolitan R demands far less charging upkeep than the Amazfit GTS 4. Screen size also favors the Amazfit GTS 4, at 1.75" versus the Timex Metropolitan R's 1.2", making it easier to read notifications and metrics at a glance.
Pros & Cons
Amazfit GTS 4
Pros
- Larger 1.75" display
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Shorter battery life (7 days)
- Costs a bit more
Timex Metropolitan R
Pros
- Much longer battery life (12 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Smaller 1.2" display
Which One Is Right For You?
- Amazfit GTS 4: Makes the most sense for anyone who prefers a larger, easier-to-read display.
- Timex Metropolitan R: Best for someone who wants to charge as infrequently as possible and wants to spend a little less.
Conclusion
Neither watch is a strict downgrade from the other — each wins on a different practical dimension, so the right pick depends on which of those matters more day to day.
Summary
Amazfit GTS 4
Strengths
- Larger 1.75" display
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Shorter battery life (7 days)
- Costs a bit more
Timex Metropolitan R
Strengths
- Much longer battery life (12 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Smaller 1.2" display
There's no universal winner here — match the pick to whichever tradeoff (battery life, screen, or connectivity) actually applies to daily use.