CCompareHub
Compare

Amazfit T-Rex 3 vs COROS Pace 3

At $279.99 and $229, the Amazfit T-Rex 3 and COROS Pace 3 sit close enough in price to be genuine alternatives — here's how they actually compare.

Amazfit T-Rex 3

The Amazfit T-Rex 3 brings a 1.5" display, 27 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS, 10ATM water resistance to the table.

$279.99

Global reference price

COROS Pace 3

The COROS Pace 3 offers a 1.2" display, 24 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS, 5ATM water resistance.

$229

Global reference price

Specification Comparison

Amazfit T-Rex 3COROS Pace 3
Screen Size1.5 inch1.2 inch
Battery Life27 days24 days
Water Resistance10ATM5ATM
Built-in GPSYesYes
Cellular ConnectivityNoNo

Key Differences

Screen size also favors the Amazfit T-Rex 3, at 1.5" versus the COROS Pace 3's 1.2", making it easier to read notifications and metrics at a glance.

Pros & Cons

Amazfit T-Rex 3

Pros

  • Larger 1.5" display
  • Built-in GPS

Cons

  • Costs a bit more

COROS Pace 3

Pros

  • Lower price
  • Built-in GPS

Cons

  • Smaller 1.2" display

Which One Is Right For You?

  • Amazfit T-Rex 3: Makes the most sense for anyone who prefers a larger, easier-to-read display.
  • COROS Pace 3: Best for someone who wants to spend a little less.

Conclusion

Neither watch is a strict downgrade from the other — each wins on a different practical dimension, so the right pick depends on which of those matters more day to day.

Summary

Amazfit T-Rex 3

Strengths

  • Larger 1.5" display
  • Built-in GPS

Weaknesses

  • Costs a bit more

COROS Pace 3

Strengths

  • Lower price
  • Built-in GPS

Weaknesses

  • Smaller 1.2" display

There's no universal winner here — match the pick to whichever tradeoff (battery life, screen, or connectivity) actually applies to daily use.