CCompareHub
Compare

Amazfit T-Rex 3 vs Suunto Race S

Shoppers weighing the Amazfit T-Rex 3 against the Suunto Race S are looking at two smartwatches within $69.01 of each other, which puts the real decision on which one's feature set actually fits how it'll be worn day to day.

Amazfit T-Rex 3

The Amazfit T-Rex 3 is built around a 1.5" display, 27 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS, 10ATM water resistance.

$279.99

Global reference price

Suunto Race S

The Suunto Race S packs 9 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS.

$349

Global reference price

Specification Comparison

Amazfit T-Rex 3Suunto Race S
Screen Size1.5 inchUnknown
Battery Life27 days9 days
Water Resistance10ATMUnknown
Built-in GPSYesYes
Cellular ConnectivityNoNo

Key Differences

With 27 days of battery life against 9, the Amazfit T-Rex 3 demands far less charging upkeep than the Suunto Race S.

Pros & Cons

Amazfit T-Rex 3

Pros

  • Much longer battery life (27 days)
  • Lower price
  • Built-in GPS

Cons

  • No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price

Suunto Race S

Pros

  • Built-in GPS

Cons

  • Shorter battery life (9 days)
  • Costs a bit more

Which One Is Right For You?

  • Amazfit T-Rex 3: Makes the most sense for anyone who wants to charge as infrequently as possible and wants to spend a little less.
  • Suunto Race S: Best for someone who prefers Suunto's ecosystem and design.

Conclusion

The two trade advantages on different fronts rather than one clearly beating the other outright, so the better fit depends on what matters most for daily wear.

Summary

Amazfit T-Rex 3

Strengths

  • Much longer battery life (27 days)
  • Lower price
  • Built-in GPS

Weaknesses

  • No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price

Suunto Race S

Strengths

  • Built-in GPS

Weaknesses

  • Shorter battery life (9 days)
  • Costs a bit more

Weigh the tradeoffs above against actual use: battery life, screen size, and connectivity matter differently depending on how the watch will be worn day to day.