Apple Watch SE 3 vs Garmin Forerunner 165
Shoppers weighing the Apple Watch SE 3 against the Garmin Forerunner 165 are looking at two smartwatches within $0 of each other, which puts the real decision on which one's feature set actually fits how it'll be worn day to day.
The Apple Watch SE 3 is built around a 1.17" display, 1 day of typical battery life, built-in GPS, 50m water resistance.
Global reference price
The Garmin Forerunner 165 packs a 1.2" display, 11 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS.
Global reference price
Specification Comparison
Key Differences
With 11 days of battery life against 1, the Garmin Forerunner 165 demands far less charging upkeep than the Apple Watch SE 3.
Pros & Cons
Apple Watch SE 3
Pros
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
Garmin Forerunner 165
Pros
- Much longer battery life (11 days)
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Which One Is Right For You?
- Apple Watch SE 3: Makes the most sense for anyone who prefers apple's ecosystem and design.
- Garmin Forerunner 165: Best for someone who wants to charge as infrequently as possible.
Conclusion
The two trade advantages on different fronts rather than one clearly beating the other outright, so the better fit depends on what matters most for daily wear.
Summary
Apple Watch SE 3
Strengths
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
Garmin Forerunner 165
Strengths
- Much longer battery life (11 days)
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Weigh the tradeoffs above against actual use: battery life, screen size, and connectivity matter differently depending on how the watch will be worn day to day.