Fossil Gen 6 vs COROS Pace 3
Shoppers weighing the Fossil Gen 6 against the COROS Pace 3 are looking at two smartwatches within $70 of each other, which puts the real decision on which one's feature set actually fits how it'll be worn day to day.
The Fossil Gen 6 is built around a 1.28" display, 1 day of typical battery life, built-in GPS.
Global reference price
The COROS Pace 3 packs a 1.2" display, 24 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS, 5ATM water resistance.
Global reference price
Specification Comparison
Key Differences
With 24 days of battery life against 1, the COROS Pace 3 demands far less charging upkeep than the Fossil Gen 6.
Pros & Cons
Fossil Gen 6
Pros
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
- Costs a bit more
COROS Pace 3
Pros
- Much longer battery life (24 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Which One Is Right For You?
- Fossil Gen 6: Makes the most sense for anyone who prefers Fossil's ecosystem and design.
- COROS Pace 3: Best for someone who wants to charge as infrequently as possible and wants to spend a little less.
Conclusion
The two trade advantages on different fronts rather than one clearly beating the other outright, so the better fit depends on what matters most for daily wear.
Summary
Fossil Gen 6
Strengths
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
- Costs a bit more
COROS Pace 3
Strengths
- Much longer battery life (24 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Weigh the tradeoffs above against actual use: battery life, screen size, and connectivity matter differently depending on how the watch will be worn day to day.