Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Amazfit GTR 4
Shoppers weighing the Garmin Forerunner 165 against the Amazfit GTR 4 are looking at two smartwatches within $49.01 of each other, which puts the real decision on which one's feature set actually fits how it'll be worn day to day.
The Garmin Forerunner 165 is built around a 1.2" display, 11 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS.
Global reference price
Specification Comparison
Key Differences
The Amazfit GTR 4 has a visibly larger display (1.43" vs 1.2"), an advantage for reading data on the move.
Pros & Cons
Garmin Forerunner 165
Pros
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Smaller 1.2" display
- Costs a bit more
Amazfit GTR 4
Pros
- Larger 1.43" display
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Which One Is Right For You?
- Garmin Forerunner 165: Best for someone who prefers Garmin's ecosystem and design.
- Amazfit GTR 4: A good fit for buyers who prefers a larger, easier-to-read display and wants to spend a little less.
Conclusion
The two trade advantages on different fronts rather than one clearly beating the other outright, so the better fit depends on what matters most for daily wear.
Summary
Garmin Forerunner 165
Strengths
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Smaller 1.2" display
- Costs a bit more
Amazfit GTR 4
Strengths
- Larger 1.43" display
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Weigh the tradeoffs above against actual use: battery life, screen size, and connectivity matter differently depending on how the watch will be worn day to day.