Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Amazfit GTS 4
With only $49.01 separating them, the Garmin Forerunner 165 and the Amazfit GTS 4 are worth comparing spec-for-spec rather than by price alone.
The Garmin Forerunner 165 packs a 1.2" display, 11 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS.
Global reference price
The Amazfit GTS 4 is built around a 1.75" display, 7 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS.
Global reference price
Specification Comparison
Key Differences
The Garmin Forerunner 165 lasts noticeably longer between charges — 11 days versus 7 — which matters most for multi-day trips or anyone who dislikes daily charging routines. The Amazfit GTS 4 has a visibly larger display (1.75" vs 1.2"), an advantage for reading data on the move.
Pros & Cons
Garmin Forerunner 165
Pros
- Much longer battery life (11 days)
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Smaller 1.2" display
- Costs a bit more
Amazfit GTS 4
Pros
- Larger 1.75" display
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Shorter battery life (7 days)
Which One Is Right For You?
- Garmin Forerunner 165: A good fit for buyers who wants to charge as infrequently as possible.
- Amazfit GTS 4: Makes the most sense for anyone who prefers a larger, easier-to-read display and wants to spend a little less.
Conclusion
The two trade advantages on different fronts rather than one clearly beating the other outright, so the better fit depends on what matters most for daily wear.
Summary
Garmin Forerunner 165
Strengths
- Much longer battery life (11 days)
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Smaller 1.2" display
- Costs a bit more
Amazfit GTS 4
Strengths
- Larger 1.75" display
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Shorter battery life (7 days)
Weigh the tradeoffs above against actual use: battery life, screen size, and connectivity matter differently depending on how the watch will be worn day to day.