Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Fitbit Charge 6
With only $90 separating them, the Garmin Forerunner 165 and the Fitbit Charge 6 are worth comparing spec-for-spec rather than by price alone.
The Garmin Forerunner 165 packs a 1.2" display, 11 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS.
Global reference price
The Fitbit Charge 6 is built around built-in GPS, 50m water resistance.
Global reference price
Specification Comparison
Key Differences
With battery life, screen size, and connectivity all landing close together, there's no single spec that clearly separates these two — the practical choice comes down to brand ecosystem and design preference rather than a functional gap.
Pros & Cons
Garmin Forerunner 165
Pros
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Costs a bit more
Fitbit Charge 6
Pros
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Which One Is Right For You?
- Garmin Forerunner 165: Makes the most sense for anyone who prefers Garmin's ecosystem and design.
- Fitbit Charge 6: Best for someone who wants to spend a little less.
Conclusion
Neither watch pulls clearly ahead on the numbers here, so the choice really comes down to which brand's app ecosystem and design a buyer already prefers.
Summary
Garmin Forerunner 165
Strengths
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Costs a bit more
Fitbit Charge 6
Strengths
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Weigh the tradeoffs above against actual use: battery life, screen size, and connectivity matter differently depending on how the watch will be worn day to day.