Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Google Pixel Watch 4 (41mm)
With only $40.99 separating them, the Garmin Forerunner 165 and the Google Pixel Watch 4 (41mm) are worth comparing spec-for-spec rather than by price alone.
The Garmin Forerunner 165 packs a 1.2" display, 11 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS.
Global reference price
The Google Pixel Watch 4 (41mm) is built around a 1.2" display, 1 day of typical battery life, built-in GPS, 5ATM+IP68 water resistance.
Global reference price
Specification Comparison
Key Differences
With 11 days of battery life against 1, the Garmin Forerunner 165 demands far less charging upkeep than the Google Pixel Watch 4 (41mm).
Pros & Cons
Garmin Forerunner 165
Pros
- Much longer battery life (11 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Google Pixel Watch 4 (41mm)
Pros
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
- Costs a bit more
Which One Is Right For You?
- Garmin Forerunner 165: Makes the most sense for anyone who wants to charge as infrequently as possible and wants to spend a little less.
- Google Pixel Watch 4 (41mm): Best for someone who prefers Google's ecosystem and design.
Conclusion
The two trade advantages on different fronts rather than one clearly beating the other outright, so the better fit depends on what matters most for daily wear.
Summary
Garmin Forerunner 165
Strengths
- Much longer battery life (11 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Google Pixel Watch 4 (41mm)
Strengths
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
- Costs a bit more
Weigh the tradeoffs above against actual use: battery life, screen size, and connectivity matter differently depending on how the watch will be worn day to day.