Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Polar Ignite 3
Shoppers weighing the Garmin Forerunner 165 against the Polar Ignite 3 are looking at two smartwatches within $91 of each other, which puts the real decision on which one's feature set actually fits how it'll be worn day to day.
The Garmin Forerunner 165 is built around a 1.2" display, 11 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS.
Global reference price
The Polar Ignite 3 packs a 1.28" display, 5 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS.
Global reference price
Specification Comparison
Key Differences
The Garmin Forerunner 165 lasts noticeably longer between charges — 11 days versus 5 — which matters most for multi-day trips or anyone who dislikes daily charging routines.
Pros & Cons
Garmin Forerunner 165
Pros
- Much longer battery life (11 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Polar Ignite 3
Pros
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Shorter battery life (5 days)
- Costs a bit more
Which One Is Right For You?
- Garmin Forerunner 165: A good fit for buyers who wants to charge as infrequently as possible and wants to spend a little less.
- Polar Ignite 3: Makes the most sense for anyone who prefers Polar's ecosystem and design.
Conclusion
The two trade advantages on different fronts rather than one clearly beating the other outright, so the better fit depends on what matters most for daily wear.
Summary
Garmin Forerunner 165
Strengths
- Much longer battery life (11 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Polar Ignite 3
Strengths
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Shorter battery life (5 days)
- Costs a bit more
Weigh the tradeoffs above against actual use: battery life, screen size, and connectivity matter differently depending on how the watch will be worn day to day.