Garmin Vivoactive 5 vs COROS Pace 3
Shoppers weighing the Garmin Vivoactive 5 against the COROS Pace 3 are looking at two smartwatches within $70.99 of each other, which puts the real decision on which one's feature set actually fits how it'll be worn day to day.
The Garmin Vivoactive 5 is built around a 1.2" display, 11 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS, 5ATM water resistance.
Global reference price
The COROS Pace 3 packs a 1.2" display, 24 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS, 5ATM water resistance.
Global reference price
Specification Comparison
Key Differences
Battery life is a major gap here: the COROS Pace 3 is rated for 24 days against the Garmin Vivoactive 5's 11, meaning far fewer trips to the charger.
Pros & Cons
Garmin Vivoactive 5
Pros
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Shorter battery life (11 days)
- Costs a bit more
COROS Pace 3
Pros
- Much longer battery life (24 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Which One Is Right For You?
- Garmin Vivoactive 5: Best for someone who prefers Garmin's ecosystem and design.
- COROS Pace 3: A good fit for buyers who wants to charge as infrequently as possible and wants to spend a little less.
Conclusion
The two trade advantages on different fronts rather than one clearly beating the other outright, so the better fit depends on what matters most for daily wear.
Summary
Garmin Vivoactive 5
Strengths
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Shorter battery life (11 days)
- Costs a bit more
COROS Pace 3
Strengths
- Much longer battery life (24 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Weigh the tradeoffs above against actual use: battery life, screen size, and connectivity matter differently depending on how the watch will be worn day to day.