Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) vs Amazfit Balance 2
The Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) and the Amazfit Balance 2 are priced $99.01 apart — $399 versus $299.99 — close enough that the choice between them comes down to features, not budget.
The Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) offers a 1.4" display, 1 day of typical battery life, built-in GPS, 5ATM+IP68 water resistance.
Global reference price
The Amazfit Balance 2 brings a 1.5" display, 21 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS, 5ATM water resistance to the table.
Global reference price
Specification Comparison
Key Differences
The Amazfit Balance 2 lasts noticeably longer between charges — 21 days versus 1 — which matters most for multi-day trips or anyone who dislikes daily charging routines.
Pros & Cons
Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm)
Pros
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
- Costs a bit more
Amazfit Balance 2
Pros
- Much longer battery life (21 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Which One Is Right For You?
- Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm): A good fit for buyers who prefers Google's ecosystem and design.
- Amazfit Balance 2: Makes the most sense for anyone who wants to charge as infrequently as possible and wants to spend a little less.
Conclusion
Neither watch is a strict downgrade from the other — each wins on a different practical dimension, so the right pick depends on which of those matters more day to day.
Summary
Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm)
Strengths
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
- Costs a bit more
Amazfit Balance 2
Strengths
- Much longer battery life (21 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
There's no universal winner here — match the pick to whichever tradeoff (battery life, screen, or connectivity) actually applies to daily use.