Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) vs Garmin Vivoactive 5
Shoppers weighing the Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) against the Garmin Vivoactive 5 are looking at two smartwatches within $99.01 of each other, which puts the real decision on which one's feature set actually fits how it'll be worn day to day.
The Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) is built around a 1.4" display, 1 day of typical battery life, built-in GPS, 5ATM+IP68 water resistance.
Global reference price
The Garmin Vivoactive 5 packs a 1.2" display, 11 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS, 5ATM water resistance.
Global reference price
Specification Comparison
Key Differences
With 11 days of battery life against 1, the Garmin Vivoactive 5 demands far less charging upkeep than the Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm). The Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) has a visibly larger display (1.4" vs 1.2"), an advantage for reading data on the move.
Pros & Cons
Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm)
Pros
- Larger 1.4" display
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
- Costs a bit more
Garmin Vivoactive 5
Pros
- Much longer battery life (11 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Smaller 1.2" display
Which One Is Right For You?
- Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm): Makes the most sense for anyone who prefers a larger, easier-to-read display.
- Garmin Vivoactive 5: Best for someone who wants to charge as infrequently as possible and wants to spend a little less.
Conclusion
The two trade advantages on different fronts rather than one clearly beating the other outright, so the better fit depends on what matters most for daily wear.
Summary
Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm)
Strengths
- Larger 1.4" display
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
- Costs a bit more
Garmin Vivoactive 5
Strengths
- Much longer battery life (11 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Smaller 1.2" display
Weigh the tradeoffs above against actual use: battery life, screen size, and connectivity matter differently depending on how the watch will be worn day to day.