Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) vs Suunto Race S
Shoppers weighing the Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) against the Suunto Race S are looking at two smartwatches within $50 of each other, which puts the real decision on which one's feature set actually fits how it'll be worn day to day.
The Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) is built around a 1.4" display, 1 day of typical battery life, built-in GPS, 5ATM+IP68 water resistance.
Global reference price
The Suunto Race S packs 9 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS.
Global reference price
Specification Comparison
Key Differences
The Suunto Race S lasts noticeably longer between charges — 9 days versus 1 — which matters most for multi-day trips or anyone who dislikes daily charging routines.
Pros & Cons
Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm)
Pros
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
- Costs a bit more
Suunto Race S
Pros
- Much longer battery life (9 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Which One Is Right For You?
- Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm): A good fit for buyers who prefers Google's ecosystem and design.
- Suunto Race S: Makes the most sense for anyone who wants to charge as infrequently as possible and wants to spend a little less.
Conclusion
The two trade advantages on different fronts rather than one clearly beating the other outright, so the better fit depends on what matters most for daily wear.
Summary
Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm)
Strengths
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
- Costs a bit more
Suunto Race S
Strengths
- Much longer battery life (9 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Weigh the tradeoffs above against actual use: battery life, screen size, and connectivity matter differently depending on how the watch will be worn day to day.