Suunto Race S vs Casio Pro Trek Smart WSD-F20A
Shoppers weighing the Suunto Race S against the Casio Pro Trek Smart WSD-F20A are looking at two smartwatches within $50 of each other, which puts the real decision on which one's feature set actually fits how it'll be worn day to day.
The Suunto Race S is built around 9 days of typical battery life, built-in GPS.
Global reference price
The Casio Pro Trek Smart WSD-F20A packs a 1.32" display, 1 day of typical battery life, built-in GPS.
Global reference price
Specification Comparison
Key Differences
With 9 days of battery life against 1, the Suunto Race S demands far less charging upkeep than the Casio Pro Trek Smart WSD-F20A.
Pros & Cons
Suunto Race S
Pros
- Much longer battery life (9 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Casio Pro Trek Smart WSD-F20A
Pros
- Built-in GPS
Cons
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
- Costs a bit more
Which One Is Right For You?
- Suunto Race S: Makes the most sense for anyone who wants to charge as infrequently as possible and wants to spend a little less.
- Casio Pro Trek Smart WSD-F20A: Best for someone who prefers Casio's ecosystem and design.
Conclusion
The two trade advantages on different fronts rather than one clearly beating the other outright, so the better fit depends on what matters most for daily wear.
Summary
Suunto Race S
Strengths
- Much longer battery life (9 days)
- Lower price
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- No significant weakness versus the alternative at this price
Casio Pro Trek Smart WSD-F20A
Strengths
- Built-in GPS
Weaknesses
- Shorter battery life (1 days)
- Costs a bit more
Weigh the tradeoffs above against actual use: battery life, screen size, and connectivity matter differently depending on how the watch will be worn day to day.